Welcome to Virtual Severus Snape, home of historical objectivity.
Historical Veritaserum
9 Feb 2010, Comments Off

The Theme of Sun Worship: Song and Video

Author: Sirius Black
No Gravatar

This song & video brought to you by VSS.

No Gravatar

Source: http://en.auschwitz.org.pl/m/index.php?option=com_ponygallery&func=detail&id=787&Itemid=17

The ones and two on the right here are the bonus Reichsmarks earned by each prisoner for fishing. How does this information fit in to the official Death Eater "holocaust" thesis?

Bonus list 

Description: Lists of bonuses [SS: in Reichsmarks] for prisoners (Prämienscheine) of Fischteiche 1B workgroup [SS: for fishing, probably in order to help feed people at the camp]. They were given for completed work between June 3 – September 9, 1944 and made by the capo of the group Jan Konkłowicz (camp no. 18966); On the lists there are names, camp numbers, nationality, the sum of the bonus and prisoner’s signature. The heading consists of the name of the workgroup, number of prisoners, the exact date, the signature of the capo and the stamp of KL [SS: acronym for Konzentrationslager] Birkenau. (State Museum Auschwitz-Birkenau Archives)

Source: http://en.auschwitz.org.pl/m/index.php?option=com_ponygallery&Itemid=17&func=detail&id=555#ponyimg

Why on earth would the Nazis have issued death certificates if they wished to keep prisoner deaths a secret? One does not self-implicate by documenting one's genocide on paper if one is in fact committing genocide. The idea of extermination is to ERASE the existence of a people so that no one knows how many were killed. That is what the Soviets did.

Description

Death certificate of Polish prisoner Janusz Pogonowski (in the camp as Janusz Skrzetuski) (Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum Archives)

Source: http://en.auschwitz.org.pl/m/index.php? option=com_
ponygallery&Itemid=
17&func=detail&id=507#ponyimg

Report on shooting a Hungarian Jew

Description: A report on shooting a Hungarian Jew while trying to escape in the Auschwitz subcamp in Goleszów. (Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum Archives)

Source: http://en.auschwitz.org.pl/m/index.php?option=com_ponygallery&Itemid=17
&func=detail&id=1617#ponyimg

List of prisoners selected to the gas chambers

Description: The third page of the list of 394 female Jewish prisoners selected to the gas chambers on November 19, 1943. It was signed by the camp commander SS-Untersturmführer Hössler.

This anonymous, unmarked "document" is supposed to be a list of those earmarked for the "gas chambers," which, oddly, were missing upon Allied occupation in 1945. The Soviets constructed a "gas chamber" in 1948.

A copy of the typewritten list, stolen in the women’s camp, was turned to the resistance organization in the Auschwitz I camp and sent to Cracow on November 21, 1943 by Stanisław Kłodziński, for use and transmission to London. (Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum Archives)

Source: http://en.auschwitz.org.pl/m/index.php?option=com_ponygallery&Itemid=17&func=detail&id=490#ponyimg

Hospital register

Who in their right mind has a hospital at an extermination center and "death camp"? What a waste of money, resources, and time. If your goal is extermination, why offer medical services? Olga Lengyel, a "holocaust survivor" of Jewish descent, said that Auschwitz authorities were "overwhelmed" by the number of "new births" at Auschwitz. Now isn't that an odd statement...

Description: Pages from Block 20 register (camp hospital). Red crosses in the last columns mean death of patients. (Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum Archives)

Source: http://en.auschwitz.
org.pl/m/index.php?option=com_pony
gallery&Itemid=17
&func=detail&
id=487#ponyimg

Police report on the revolt in Sonderkommando

In this document, the Nazis admit to having shot a few escapees on their way out. Escape was always punishable by death and the prisoners knew this from the get-go. British & American POWs who tried to escape were shot too. This was not a matter of race, but security. Further, who documents shootings in a police report (why get the police involved at all!) if one is secretly exterminating people? Again, why DOCUMENT your crimes and self-implicate? With the Germans, everything was official. They hid nothing. There were no secrets. There was no genocide plan at any point.

Description: A report from a local police station in Oświęcim considering the revolt of prisoners from the Sonderkommando on October 7, 1944. It says about an escape of “a large number of prisoners” from the Sonderkommando at 2 p.m., a description of the prisoners and information that some prisoners were shot during the chase. At the end the report says that 4 prisoners were not captured at that time. (Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum Archives)

Source: http://en.auschwitz.org.pl/m/index.php?option=com_ponygallery&Itemid=17&func=detail&id=486#ponyimg

Los Angeles Times on crimes in KL Auschwitz

Description: A press article in Los Angeles Times from March 22, 1944 informing about crimes commited in KL Auschwitz. (Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum Archives)

This is as believable as the accusations in 1991 that Saddam Hussein had mobile gas chambers for Jews and ordered his troops to throw babies out of incubators. Usually this atrocity propaganda (i.e., "perception management" for the sake of warfare) is tossed aside and exposed as fake after the war ends and everyone is dead. In the case of WWII, the fake stuff was promoted as factual. This article is utter hogwash. Where are the mass graves and gas chambers to support this foreign news report based on a few eyewitness accounts?

Source: http://en.auschwitz.org.pl/m/index.php?option=com_ponygallery&Itemid=17&func=detail&id=772#ponyimg

Punishment report

Description: A punishment report for Marie Tajfelbaum. It wanted 5 nights in standing cell for picking an apple. (Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum Archives)

And here we have a punishment report. Apparently a Jew picked an apple and had to go to a standing cell for up to five days as a result. The idea behind this was not to starve people, but to enforce a code of ethics and discipline at the camp. If you let one prisoner get away with doing whatever he or she wants, soon you have anarchy and disorder. Look at America's public schools today: a complete joke. The schools have allowed the discipline structure to break down in the American school system, so now chaos reigns.

This primary evidence brought to you by VSS.

No Gravatar

http://virtualseverussnape.org/Audio/Pigs-Pink-Floyd.wma

by Phil Craig | February 5, 2010

Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1248615/Mass-murder-stroke-genius-saved-Britain-As-closer-ties-France-planned-betrayal-forgive.html#ixzz0esA1qO2l

French sailor Andre Jaffre still shakes with emotion as he recalls the moment in July 1940 that the enemy opened fire on his battleship, the Bretagne. ‘A shell exploded underneath, where there were munitions and a fuel store. I saw a friend who’d had his head blown off. His blood dripped off me. I wanted to be sick.’

Moments later, the Bretagne capsized. ‘The water was black with oil that was smoking and bubbling, like a chip pan, and men were struggling and screaming in it. But I had to jump in. I fell into that oil and I let myself sink, sink, sink. I was so burned.’

Jaffre had joined the navy determined to fight the Nazis. But the shells that rained down on him that morning were not German ones. They were British, fired by men that Jaffre knew well.

"NEVER FORGET: The attack on the French Navy in 1940."

‘Only two weeks before, we’d been with the British in Gibraltar, out on the town,’ he says, ‘and then suddenly they’re firing on us. It was unthinkable.’ Jaffre’s comrade Leon Le Roux remembers the same shock. ‘Today we’re allies, tomorrow we’re enemies. The reasons for it? For that see Sir Winston Churchill.’

Only this week, at the unveiling of a Green Paper on military reform, it was suggested that the Government is considering closer military ties with France. Such a move, to cut costs, could represent a 21st-century entente cordiale.

‘The water was black with oil that was smoking and bubbling, like a chip pan, and men were struggling and screaming in it’

But while military ties between our two countries grow closer, it is worth remembering the tragic event that scarred Britain’s wartime alliance with France – a bloody assault that many across the Channel still see as an unforgiveable betrayal.

One of the men firing at Jaffre and Leon Le Roux that day in 1940 was a British sailor called Robert Philpott. Like many who took part in Operation Catapult, he spent the rest of his life living with regret.

‘It was shattering to see what we had just done,’ he said. ‘It was a scene of utter devastation. I don’t have any pride in being part of it, only great sadness – Churchill was in control, not our Admiral. If it had been our Admiral, we’d never have done it. But he had a direct order to “do it now”.’

The British rightly celebrate the legend of 1940. In that familiar story of ‘Our Finest Hour’, Britain stands alone against the Nazi war machine, Churchill spits defiance and the RAF breaks the mighty Luftwaffe, destroying Hitler’s plans to invade our island. But this is the story of another British victory of that year. It’s a lot less glorious than the Battle of Britain, but some historians think it was just as important.

"Fuelled propaganda: British bill poster by the Vichy government caricaturing Winston Churchill. ALGERIA - JULY 03: World War II. Anti-British bill poster by the Vichy government caricaturing Winston Churchill after the destruction of the French fleet in Mers el-Kebir and Dakar (end of 1940)." (Photo by Roger Viollet/Getty Images)

One thousand three hundred men died on the day Jaffre swam through burning oil in Mers-el-Kebir, a French port on the North African coast. French historians refer to the attack as their Pearl Harbour, as an infamous stab in the back from an old ally. Le Roux is one of many who will never forgive the British.

‘What do you want the French to think?’ he asks. ‘It’s a betrayal yes, but not only a betrayal, it was murder. A crime. Yes, a real crime.’

So, what made Churchill launch Operation Catapult? The answer lies in eight weeks of political intrigue and military disaster, with trust in allies collapsing and a friendless Britain facing annihilation. Eight weeks before Catapult, Hitler’s Blitzkrieg struck Western Europe and sent the world into shock. France, Belgium and Holland soon slumped to defeat, and the British Army struggled to evacuate its battered divisions from Dunkirk. Britain stood alone.

Prime Minister Winston Churchill urgently needed warships to ward off the threat of invasion and protect Britain’s trade routes from Hitler’s marauding U-Boats. He turned to the one friendly nation left – America.

The U.S. navy had 50 antique destroyers it didn’t need. They would be the perfect boost to Britain. But when Churchill asked him for them, President Roosevelt said ‘No’. In Washington, the smart money was betting on a rapid British defeat or capitulation. Men such as Joe Kennedy, the U.S. ambassador in London, thought that America should not waste resources on a lost cause.

It is worth remembering the tragic event that scarred Britain’s wartime alliance with France – a bloody assault that many across the Channel still see as an unforgivable betrayal Something dramatic would have to happen to make Roosevelt think that Britain stood a fighting chance.

Although Operation Catapult was certainly carried out to impress the Americans, the direct cause was the collapse of trust between Britain and France. Even after its government fled Paris, Churchill, a passionate Francophile all his life, tried to keep the French government in the war.

Twice he risked his life flying to French towns to meet the shattered men who were trying to run the country. But it became obvious that they would soon seek an armistice with Hitler.

Knowing that nothing mattered more than warships, Churchill sought a guarantee on the fate of the French fleet. Its world-class battleships, cruisers and submarines would be a huge boost to the small German navy. In Hitler’s hands these ships could tip the balance of power and trigger the invasion of Britain.

"Adolf Hitler negotiated a deal with the French, much to Winston Churchill's dismay."

Churchill demanded pledges that the French fleet would sail to a British harbour and not be used as a bargaining chip with Hitler. He thought that the French had agreed to this. But when the armistice talks began, the French navy didn’t move.

Seizing his chance, Hitler offered the French a tempting deal. If they accepted his conditions to end the war, they could continue to administer southern France with no German troops occupying it. And Hitler’s terms? The French fleet must return to home ports within weeks, where it would remain under German ’supervision’.

The French government agreed. When Churchill learned of this, according to his official biographer, Sir Martin Gilbert, ‘he was very frightened. At first he didn’t believe it. He felt betrayed’.

France’s top naval commander Admiral Francois Darlan reassured London that his ships would never fall into Hitler’s hands. ‘As long as I can issue orders, you have nothing to fear,’ he promised. But with so much at stake, could Darlan be relied upon? Churchill decided he could not.

By now, there was little trust on either side. The French swore that they would never hand over their warships to the Germans, but they were also adamant that Britain did not have the right to tell them what to doThe Admiralty rapidly planned a global operation to neutralise the French navy. It called Operation Catapult ‘disagreeable and difficult’ in a telegram to its commanders. But it also urged them: ‘Be relentless.’

Historian Andrew Lambert believes that Catapult was necessary militarily, but that it also sent an important signal to the rest of the world – especially to America. Here was proof that the Old Lion was not finished yet.

The Royal Navy’s ‘Force H’, commanded by Admiral James Somerville, sailed from Gibraltar on July 2, led by three battleships and an aircraft carrier. That night, a signal arrived from the Admiralty giving the text of the ultimatum to be delivered to the French commander at Mers-el-Kebir.

That same night in Portsmouth and Plymouth, armed parties seized two French battleships, four cruisers, some submarines, eight destroyers and 200 smaller vessels. It was mostly peaceful, but on the submarine Surcouf there was a shootout, resulting in the death of three British officers and a French sailor.

At dawn on July 3 in Alexandria, the Navy seized a French battleship and four cruisers. British squadrons also arrived to prevent French warships leaving their bases in the West Indies and West Africa.

That same morning, the French sailors at Mers-el-Kebir awoke to the threatening silhouettes of Force H, including the massive battleship HMS Hood.

The choices Somerville offered to the French commander were stark: join the British, sail to a British or West Indian port, scuttle, or be attacked.

Captain Holland of the Ark Royal, who knew many of the French officers personally, was sent forward in HMS Foxhound to negotiate.

Robert Philpott, on board HMS Hood, did not expect trouble. ‘We all firmly believed that the [French] ships would come out and join us,’ he said.

Andre Jaffre says: ‘We were happy to see them. We shouted to each other: “The British have arrived! They’ve come to get us to continue the fight against the Nazis.” ‘

BIG MAN, PIG MAN: "Wormtail became widely hated by the French."

Negotiations lasted all day. Captain Holland shuttled back and forth, but on his second visit, he noticed that the French ships were at battle stations. Messages flew between North Africa and France and between Force H and London.

At first it seemed like the French might comply, then messages were intercepted which suggested that Admiral Darlan was sending reinforcements to confront the British.

By now, there was little trust on either side. The French swore that they would never hand over their warships to the Germans, but they were also adamant that Britain did not have the right to tell them what to do.

Churchill was long past trust as far as France was concerned and fears grew that French reinforcements or German U-boats might arrive. A blunt three-word telegram reached Admiral Somerville from London: ‘Settle matters quickly.’

At 5.54pm, HMS Hood opened fire, followed by HMS Valiant and Resolution. Between them, they sent almost 150 15in shells into the harbour, each weighing three-quarters of a ton. The noise alone made Le Roux’s ears bleed. ‘I can’t describe it to you,’ he says. ‘It was fear certainly, pure terror.

‘Soon, everything was on fire. There were flames everywhere, with balls of fire landing in the sea. And the men around me were screaming “save me”. It was hell, just hell.’

It was one of the most concentrated big gun naval barrages in history. And although the French warships fired back, they were unable to manoeuvre in the crowded docks. Watching from HMS Hood, Robert Philpott could hardly believe what was happening. ‘For us, it was like shooting fish in a barrel,’ he said.

Inside the harbour, French casualties quickly mounted. Jaffre ’saw bodies all around me, stomachs blown open and severed heads’.

‘And the shells kept on falling and guys were shouting “finish me off, kill me, kill me please”, because they were so badly burned, had lost limbs, everything. They were asking for the coup de grace.’

Another shell flew past Jaffre, penetrated the deck armour and hit the Bretagne’s magazine, creating a huge explosion and sending an enormous cloud up over the harbour. Soon Jaffre was struggling in the oil-filled water.

‘I swam underwater as far as possible away from the ship and came up to the surface. But every time I came out of the water, I came up into this boiling oil. So I breathed in smoke and oil and I’d dive in again for as long as I could. At one point, I came up in a spot with no oil and from there I saw an abominable spectacle. The Bretagne was capsizing.’

At a primal, atavistic level, the fact that Britain was doing something bold and aggressive, even against a recent ally, made people feel better after months of retreat and humiliationMore than 1,000 of Jaffre’s shipmates died in their shattered battleship. In under 15 minutes the Royal Navy had killed more Frenchmen – almost 1,300 of them – than they had killed Germans in any single action in the war thus far.

British Admiral Somerville was despondent, writing that ‘this was the biggest political blunder of modern times and will rouse the whole world against us – we all feel thoroughly ashamed’.

But he was wrong. Despite a lingering sense of shame in the Royal Navy, Operation Catapult was one of the first real British successes of the war. The better part of the French navy was either seized or put out of action, and Britain’s strategic situation was dramatically improved.

In Parliament, Churchill explained his dilemma. ‘It is with sincere sorrow that I must now announce to the House the measures which we have felt bound to take – I leave the judgment of our actions, with confidence, to Parliament. I leave it to the nation, and I leave it to the United States. I leave it to the world and to history.’

For the first time since the war began, Churchill was cheered from all sides of the house. According to Harold Nicolson, who was present: ‘The House is first saddened by this odious attack, but is fortified by Winston’s speech. The grand finale ends in an ovation, with Winston sitting there with tears pouring down his cheeks.’

In Europe there was outrage. The Vichy regime, which included Admiral Darlan, and the German government made much propaganda play of the British ‘atrocity’. Posters showing drowning French sailors and proclaiming ‘Remember Mers-el-Kebir’ appeared all over France.

But Washington was delighted. One major strategic worry (the fate of the French fleet) was removed. And another one (Britain’s will and ability to fight) was much reduced. Roosevelt’s attitude to naval aid for Britain quickly changed and soon Churchill had a deal on his 50 destroyers, the first important sign of American support for Britain and a huge boost to British morale.

Historian Andrew Lambert believes that the attack had a profound impact. ‘It impresses the hell out of the American political class. Churchill is showing the Americans that the British mean business.’

The world’s attention quickly turned to the Battle of Britain. Without the RAF, Britain would likely lose the war, and no one should ever lessen its contribution to stopping Hitler. But without American support Britain faced much the same fate, if not in 1940 then soon thereafter.

And that’s why attacking the French was a real turning point, politically and psychologically.

Because at a primal, atavistic level, the fact that Britain was doing something bold and aggressive, even against a recent ally, made people feel better after months of retreat and humiliation.

Here was a sign that maybe all was not lost, that Churchill was in charge and that he would fight dirty if he had to. Seventy years later, unlike many of the other French survivors, Andre Jaffre looks back at the tragedy philosophically and without anger at the British.

‘It’s not betrayal. It was war with all that unfolds, and the consequences of a war. Let’s say I was deeply saddened to know that our English friends had sunk us, but what can you do?

‘I speak as an equal, to a British sailor from a French sailor. And, let us be honest, have you ever seen an intelligent war?’

This news article brought to you by VSS.

7 Feb 2010, Comments (0)

Hitlerian Wisdom

Author: Severus
No Gravatar

http://virtualseverussnape.org/Audio/Arclight-VNV-Nation.wma

Transcribed by the Half-Blood Prince

"Many nations, one motto."

“Which is the more dangerous enemy — I mean the one that threatens us most immediately? Without a doubt it is Bolshevism — we can safely call it Jewish Bolshevism. For if it were not Jewish, it could be given a different format. In that case, we might even be able to come to terms with it at some later date. But we will never be able to come to terms with Jewish Bolshevism without signing our own death warrant”….

“The Jew has just as little liking for Nordics as is the case in reverse. Except that, as long as he does not have the power, the Jew is smart enough not to let his feelings show. But once he holds the power, he no longer makes a secret of his aversion, and his aversion can easily be intensified to the point of fanatical hatred and acts of sadism. At that point his attitude becomes evident to those who were not aware of it before.”

This Hitlerian wisdom brought to you by VSS.

No Gravatar

by Duncan Kennedy | February 3, 2010

Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/europe/8497291.stm

What did Mussolini do to earn the Death Eaters' wrath? Well, he is "human cattle." The Death Eaters HATE anyone and everyone who is not them, regardless of whether you're Liberal, Fascist, or what have you.

An iPhone application that allows users to download speeches by the former Italian dictator Benito Mussolini has been withdrawn.

Its developer says he is removing it after legal threats.

But the application has also faced protests from Jewish groups and Holocaust survivors who described it as offensive.

IMussolini, as the application is known, has become the most popular iPhone download in Italy.

It has even beaten video games based on the current film sensation Avatar.

It is a 25-minute collection of video and audio clips from 100 of Mussolini’s speeches.

But now it has been withdrawn after a row with the film institute where the pictures came from.

The institute says the application is an aberration, far removed from the educational purposes for which the clips should be used.

Luigi Marino, who developed iMussolini, said he took it down after legal threats. But he says he intends to put it back on when the matter is cleared up.

A number of Jewish groups had expressed deep concern about the app.

One said it was part of the slide towards legitimising fascism and the rehabilitation of Mussolini.

Another said it was an unacceptable attempt to exalt what he called a filthy past.

Apple told us it did not want to comment on the matter.

This news article brought to you by VSS.

7 Feb 2010, Comments (0)

Dobroslav

Author: Severus
No Gravatar

Translated by Hans Krampe

Official VSS Contributor

The beginning is part of an introduction by the (nameless) person who translated Dobroslav’s article from the Russian into German. This is my translation of the German into English [HK]

In this thread I would like to introduce you to a personality who enjoys in the relevant Russian circles great authority, but is entirely unknown in Germany. I’m talking here about DOBROSLAV, born in 1938. Dobroslav is being regarded as the leading figure of Russia’s “neo-heathen” movement, as well as a nationalist and active dissident opposed to the zionist occupation regime. During the early ‘50s of the previous century he came for the first time in conflict with the system when he was incarcerated for a number of years after being convicted as the founder of the National Socialist Federation of Labour. During his incarceration he met, among others, several former Vlassov soldiers, and got to know also former members of the SS. In memory of this time he later acknowledged them in his article as ‘My Friends of the SS’. There followed more convictions and confinements, among them also a stint in the “psychiatry” (a special way station in the former USSR for particularly recalcitrant dissidents and other ideological opponents). In the end he had to defend himself against allegations of anti semitic agitation and racial hate mongering.

Jozef Zamorski: Slavic-Polish collaborator. (Bundesarchiv)

Below follows the translation of one of his works. In it Dobroslav thoroughly explains his views of the “Jewish Question,” pays due tribute to Adolf Hitler, characterizes the time of the Third Reich as a “heroic attempt of the German people to throw off the Jewish yoke” and presents his position, in manyfold ways, about the enormous historical falsifications in regard to the German people. Nevertheless, one should keep in mind that his article is written from a Russian point of view.

Who is Afraid of Russian National Socialism?

by Dobroslav

Afraid are the Jews and their accomplices. Because Russian National Socialism is a just system without Jews at the levers of power. They know this and therefore they ridicule and defame it wherever they can by equating every nationalism as “German Fascism” and every socialism as a Soviet GULAG system. They want us to believe that National Socialism always has to be “Hitlerian” National Socialism.

It is not our intention to copy the German National Socialism point by point, because it was only appropriate for the former Germany. Each people has the right to its own National Socialism, because each people has ITS OWN NATIVE COUNTRY, ITS OWN HOLY VALUES, AND ITS OWN INDIVIDUAL WAYS.

Our worldview is not a copy of a foreign ideology, but an expression of our native RUSSIAN SPIRIT. Russian National Socialism has its own ancient roots, which reach several millennia back into the old heathen past of our people. Compared with that, the ten centuries of Judeo-Christianity are nothing more than a superficial layer of dust.

THE HEATHEN CULT OF THE SUN is the original and intrinsic element of the slavic Russian soul, its original hidden kernel and archetype, which is inextinguishably anchored in the consciousness of our species. Humans follow the call of the earth and the blood subconsciously and cannot separate themselves from it. The emerging Russian National Socialism will materially manifest itself in the unified will of our species and therefore can be sure of victory.

A socialism capable of survival can only be a National Socialism in which the social principle can unfold within a national frame work, and vice versa.

——————————————————————————–

A Japanese collaborator in Germany. (Source: Asian Times)

The basis and original source of Russian National Socialism is built on the strict moral foundations of a common system of order: Comradeship, protection of the disadvantaged, and supremacy of the common good above the individual good. Russians have always rejected the power of money and a civilization dictated by the market.

~~~~~~

SS: Hitler had said, “True this misinterpretation of the Christian faith has become clearly evident only recently, through the mechanization of manual labor and the industrialization of the economy, which allowed the condition of pre-Christian industry to be revived in new forms. But where were the high priests, where were the scribes? They turned away, as they did that time in Jerusalem, from the plight of the people, and with a sanctimonious gesture they folded their hands and prayed, ‘We thank you, God, that we are not like them!’ And they drove the hungry and unemployed masses back into the dust of their despair. … But when you see the masses streaming to join the SA… you will sense the inner conversion… the faith in divine justice, in heavenly truth,… and the will to stand before the throne of the Almighty with the open heart of one ready to believe in God. And they will have sufficient greatness to stammer out the prayer for their brothers and fathers, ‘Forgive them, Lord, for they knew not what they did.’ It is on this basis alone that the new world can be built! To lay this groundwork is our task. … We must leave some things to be done for those who come after us. Your work will be a signpost for the future, a witness to our great intention, but in our time it will not be crowned with realization.”

~~~~~~

If one perceives socialism correctly, as the realization of justice on earth, then we are born socialists, because the Russian commune (it’s not meant here as the modern “commune” in the sense of a political administration, but rather in the sense of commonly owned economic property, comparative with the ancient German “Allmende” – [translator]), as well as the system of councils, are ancient social arrangements, created by the people themselves, as an expression of our NATIONAL CHARACTER.

The Soviets (councils) are an original Russian arrangement. The basic pillar of Russian National Socialism is the rule of the councils in the sense of a national-proportional representation of all autonomous, indigenous  peoples.

RUSSIAN NATIONAL SOCIALISM IS THE SUPREMACY OF THE SOVIETS WITHOUT JEWS AND COMMISSARS (the “partyocracy,” which called itself wrongly “soviet” was in reality anything but soviet).

The Russian National Socialism is destined to realize the best and noblest aspirations of the communist patriots and the Russian Nationalists. These two energies will irrepressibly merge into a powerful current. The Jews have perfectly and correctly identified them as their undoing, that’s why they whine and whimper and try to terrify the general public with horrifying tales of a red and brown menace.

Japanese collaborator.

One thing is clear: That which the Jews fear the most and which they try to defile with their worst filth, exactly that is our weapon and our salvation.

Yes, we are proudly red and brown! Red is our holy national color. We are Russians (the word “rusyj” which is also the root of the word Russia is being translated as “red-blond” [translator]) But of what color is “rusyje” hair?  The dictionary says “red-blond” or “light-brown”. SO, MAKE WAY FOR THE RED-BROWN COMMANDOS.

* * *

Japanese collaborator.

The original meaning of the Greek word “Diabolos” (devil) is “Confuser, Slanderer”. That’s why we can rightfully label the Jews as devilish spawn, because their essential basic principle is deceit and the malicious lie.

SS: Hitler said, “As long as only those with a vested interest in economic liberalism are at the helm in the authoritarian democracies — which are really not democracies at all — and in nations dominated by capitalism — where the word democracy is derived, not from demos, the people, but from daemon, the devil: until then they will wage war against socialism; and when there is no other choice, they will drive their peoples and their youth to the slaughtering block for the sake of their economic power, for their money bags, for base mammon. And all the peoples will be stupid enough, and will be kept stupid enough, to go to war in the belief that they are fighting for their fatherland. But they are fighting only to maintain the domination of capital over labor and for the interest paid on that capital.”

The Jewish conspiracy against humanity can only be resisted on the basis of an alliance of several sovereign nation states. Hence, the special hatred of the Jews for the symbols of national unity, fascism and National Socialism.

——————————————————————————–

In ancient Rome ‘Fasces’ meant a “Bundle of Rods”. It was a symbolic manifestation, saying “in unity there is strength”. There is also the ancient Russian analogy of the birch broom who cannot be destroyed. The victory of fascism was the victory of the oppressed workers in the fight for their rights. Mussolini was the only one successful in subduing the Mafia, and for that he has never been forgiven. The KAHAL (community of Jews [translator]) has succeeded to attach to the meaning of “Fascism” a negative, hostile image, so that our “democrats” and “patriots”, enemies as well as friends of Jews, habitually malign each other with the label of “Fascists”.

Fascism was originally an Italian movement, and in time that concept was extended to all genuine nationalist movements, foremost to the heroic attempt of the German people to liberate themselves from the yoke of ruthless Jewish domination.

In reaction, Jews set in motion the most gigantic lie and propaganda machine of all time. Light was declared to be darkness, and darkness to be light. All that was noble and sublime was dragged into the gutter, all positive ideas turned into their opposites.

The Jews have effectively managed to unload their own crimes and their own bloodthirsty and racist character wholesale onto the record of their enemies.

SS: This is known as psychological “projection” to psychologists. This is when one projects one’s own crimes, fears, hatreds, etc. onto others in order to mediate self-loathing (in other words, to reduce tension). Sigmund Freud, himself a Jew, called it “defense mechanism.” Yes, it is real. It goes with the crime of “perception management,” which entails the literal creation (as opposed to spinning) of facts.

The instigators of two world wars (basically intended as blood sacrifices to Jehova-Zeboat) have designated themselves as exclusive Jewish victims of National Socialism, while at the same time decrying any attempts to expose their malignant conspiracies and devise protective measures against them, as “fascism” and “anti-Semitism”, the greatest of all sins and the most terrifying of all crimes.

Nazi foreign collaboration was extensive. (Source: Borsarello & Palinckx)

Racism is foreign to us. We respect and honor the great achievements of the yellow, black and red races: Nan Madol (an ancient city ruin in the the West Pacific [translator]) and Zimbabwe (?), the Aksumitic empire (antique empire in todays Ethiopia [translator]), Burubudur (biggest buddhist temple in Indonesia [translator]), Machu Picchu (Inca city ruin [translator]) and Baalbek (antique city in Lebanon [translator]), to mention just a few.

There is only one kind of racist contempt for humanity, and that is Zionism, officially condemned in 1975 by the UN. The legal proclamation of the racial supremacy of a particular people before all others emerged for the first time in the bible. Zionism is a CANNIBALISTIC form of racism, based on a plot between the blood sucking demon Jehova and his chosen people. According to that compact the Jews were promised supreme power over all earthly creation, if they would offer in return bountiful blood sacrifices to the demon, thus ensuring his permanent existence.

For the Jews, members of all other peoples are nothing but objects for human sacrifices. The whole bible is one single hymn delighting in racial slavery and and the God pleasing spilling of blood. The vampire is insatiable in his craving for blood. To satisfy it Jehova demands the total destruction of all living heathens capable of breath. In the final analysis the entire Jewish religion culminates in the gruesome conviction, that the Jews have been chosen by God himself to carry out ritual mass murder all over the world.

A Cossack collaborator.

Since time immemorial it is assumed that blood represents the core and the soul of all life and that it incorporates the duality of nature: visible and material on the one hand, nonmaterial and hidden on the other, within something much greater and higher and not limited to the activity of the red blood-corpuscles. This explains why many rituals, such as the blood oath, blood-brotherhood or vengeful feuds were sealed in blood. The life giving power contained in the blood is so great that it can even temporarily revive the undead (vampires) from the beyond.

Within this hidden sphere of our earthly reality, mingling among us, barely beyond the habitual perception of our senses (in the so-called beyond), languish spiritual remnants of black magicians in the half-conscious, half-unconscious existence of deadly darkness. Their bodies are not completely decomposed and dependent on the constant replenishment of their energy reserves to prolong their shady existence in the beyond, by absorbing the fresh fumes of spilled blood and by indulging with pleasure in the stench of decomposition and burning fat. According to the Cabbala, these undead spirits can assume a bodily form by way of certain blood rituals, so as to appear in the material world and interfere in human concerns. The blood ritual is the payment for such manifestations. Direct indications that Jehova is a vampire can be found all over the bible, beginning with the book of Moses, chapter 8 “and the Lord smelled the lovely odor”, or the 3 book of Moses, chapter 26 etc. Salomon’s temple was nothing but a giant abattoir in which the Levites waded ankle deep in blood, while on the sacrificial altars the muzzles of carnivores were providing the proper terror.

As far as the Jews themselves are concerned, their unnatural greed for blood exposes them as parasitic, blood sucking aberrations, representing perfectly the image of their “God”. The inhaling of the “sweet smell” of their victims intestines was considered by the Jews as their greatest pleasure. For them, black magical blood rituals were normal every day common place routines. Today, Jewish butchers still slaughter animals in a ritual fashion, letting the living and fully conscious animals slowly and painfully bleed to death. For vampire demons, bleeding creatures while still alive, the smell of living blood, is the ultimate and most exciting stimulus.

Even kidnapped children were ritually sacrificed by bleeding them to death while still alive. Not necessarily only Christian children but generally children of goyim (non-Jews, being viewed by rabbis as animals on two legs). Every-time, when a mutilated child corpse was found, there was a new eruption of pogroms against Jews. Vassilii Rosanow (Russian theologian [translator]) wrote a book about the special relationship of the Jews and blood.

African member of the Nazi "Freies Arabien Division" of the Waffen SS.

In the preparation of cabalistic medicines the ash of burned bones was a preferred ingredient and included also the blood of female menstruation and candle wax made from human fat (notable parallels to the infamous lamp screens made in the KLs by the evil Nazis from the human skin of Jews. Just by such stories alone one can already recognize in what kind of minds the horror tales of the Holocaust originated. [translator]). Such poultices and potions were then customarily peddled by the Jewish apothecaries from under their counters. They also enjoyed treating sick goyim by the method of blood letting, which was commonly believed to be a panacea against all illnesses.

“And don’t be afraid of this country’s people, because we want to devour them as if they were bread,” says the bible. And in the 4 book of Moses, 14, 9: “Pious” David kills not only indiscriminately all heathens, regardless whether they are babies, adults or the old, but also invents cunning refinement in his lust for bloodshed.

As a wedding present, this special of God’s darlings, offered King Saul the foreskins of 200 bludgeoned philistines (a tribe of sun worshippers, after whom Herodot named Palestine). The ecstatic rapture of the Jews makes one shudder: “He conquered them and then had the bellies of all pregnant women slit open.” 2 book of Kings, 15. Those were not ordinary murders, because “slit open before the countenance of the Lord” were only victims who had been designated to be sacrifices.

Pessach and Purim, both the most important and delightful celebrations for the Jews, are conducted in memory of Jewish ritual massacres. Pessach celebrates the ritual massacre of Egyptian children (until 326 A.D. the Christian Easter was celebrated at the same time as Pessach). In Kyrenaika, ruled by Emperor Trajan, the Jews coolly massacred the entire unarmed citizenry: 200,000 Greeks and Romans.

Chiang Wei-kuo.

Jehova adores the stench of burning human flesh. The slow roasting over fire was the preferred method of execution of the catholic as well as the orthodox inquisition.

SS: Hitler said, “Herein lies the essential element of our mission: we must bring back to the German Volk the recognition of those teachings! For what did the falsification of the original concept of Christian love, of the community of fate before God and of socialism lead to? By their fruits ye shall know them! The suppression of freedom of opinion, the persecution of the true Christians, the vile mass murders of the Inquisition and the burning of witches, the armed campaigns against the people of free and true Christian faith, the destruction of their towns and villages, the hauling away of their cattle and their goods, the destruction of their flourishing economies, and the condemnation of their leaders before tribunals, which, in their unrelenting hypocrisy, can only be described as blasphemous….

“That is the true face of those sanctimonious churches that have placed themselves between God and man, motivated by selfishness, personal greed for recognition and gain, and the ambition to maintain their high-handed willfulness against Christ’s deep understanding of the necessity of a socialist community of men and nations…those hypocrites who have Christ on their lips but the devil in their hearts, who give alms in order to remain undisturbed as they themselves throw their money around,…who preach peace and incite to war!”

The more one hopes to receive from the vampire demon, the more favors and services one has to perform for it. Ultimately the Jews dream of obtaining world domination. In this spirit, the senseless bombardments of Dresden and Hamburg in February 1945 were horrific but plausible sacrifices, as hundreds of thousands of civilian refugees perished in giant firestorms.

The live bodies who evaporated in the nuclear infernos of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were also such ritual victims for exactly the same reasons. Of all possible victims, the “God pleasing” nuclear weapon had to hit the sun worshipping heathens, just as Jehova demanded.

The disappearance of nation states is a necessary precondition for the establishment of a single global state, ruled by Jews. But how can such a puny people, small in numbers to the point of irrelevance, whose weapons never included bravery or valor, but consisted largely of sneakiness and deceit, enslave the whole world?

The Kahal tells us how: Mingle among the peoples and degrade them from the inside. Destroy their sacred symbols, undermine their national consciousness and turn them into rootless subversives. The most successful way to achieve this is to propagate an international common religion. This very strategy is being carried out by the Judeo-Christian sects who not only genuflect before Jehova but also before Jeshua, the circumcised “Son of God”.

Jeshua (Jesus) means: “Jehova is our salvation,” also messiah. The mission of this messiah consisted of enslaving the white race through the teachings of the  Christian religion. In anticipation of the torrents of blood to be spilled in the name of Christ, came three Chaldaen practitioners of black magic to bend their knees before him.

The Jews managed to get the goyim to slavishly accept and obey their Jehova as the alleged God Father of the bible, and to denounce their ancient pagan spirituality in favor of the bible’s quisling teachings.

SS: Hitler had a different, but similar, take: “…And the last ones, God help us, who will proliferate even when the end of man has come — that will be, in spite of everything, the Jews, until they breathe the last of their miserable parasites’ lives on the piled cadavers of their victims. To postpone this point in time as far into the future as possible is our duty, our God-given mission — yes, it is the substance of Divine Creation altogether. With shameful cynicism the Jewish priests read from the Books of Moses the promise that it shall be given to the Jews by Jehovah one day to rule over all mankind: All peoples shall be subject to you, their kings shall serve you, their wealth, their work shall be thine! In vain the prophets warned against this vile blasphemy, in vain Christ called out to the Jews: ye are all brothers! They have even succeeded in the Church of Rome in falsifying this high Christian teaching of the community ordained by God, and they have taken the name of Christ in vain for the restoration of the Mosaic teachings of the promise. Even Protestantism did not protest against this anti-Christian doctrine, but only against the crassest manifestations of Jewry’s battle of decay and destruction in the Catholic Church, which was directed against everyone who tried to resist the talons of parasitism. And the struggle which the world and those churches that falsely designate themselves Christian wage against National Socialism — against us, who want only the fulfillment of Christ’s lifework — is nothing more than the continuation of the crime of the Inquisition and the burning of witches, by which the Jewish-Roman world exterminated whatever offered resistance to that shameful parasitism.”

The Zionists have focused their activities on the creation of a global empire of evil, while the deluded Judeo-Christians contribute their utmost to destroy the resistance of the earth’s peoples from the inside. While Jews are being taught in their synagogues to “divide and rule,” the Christian faithful are being taught in their churches not to resist, to accept the “will of God,” to patiently bear their cross. While the Jews express their religion as hate and revenge — an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth — the Judeo-Christian dogma insists that the naive goyim practice the exact opposite, namely, unconditional forgiveness, “love thy enemy” and “offer the other cheek. . .”

SS: This is likely a mistranslation of the original Greek, which was probably translated from Hebrew which was translated from Aramaic. The text has been translated so many times that it has almost become worthless. We believe the Nazis had it right: Saint Paul, or Rabbi Saulus, did not really have a change of heart. Instead, he pretended to be the good Christian and subverted Christ’s original message and mission to deceive the peoples into enslavement and pacivity. Jesus himself did not practice “turning his other cheek.” He attacked and denounced Jews, called them liars, hippocrites, devils, and drove them out of the temple with a bullwhip. He was likely prohibited from carrying a weapon (because he was a “fifth columnist” against the Death Eaters). That was not unconditional forgiveness in action: it was incitation and rejection in action. The Talmud even asserts that Christ was a hippocrite: He advocated peace and forgiveness, but not when it came to Jews. Had Jesus been a subversive Jew himself, the Jews would celebrate him as a hero, not as a villain and enemy boiling in hot excrement in Hell. Why would they say such things about a man on their side? That is illogical. In fact, one can no longer discern what St. Paul said from what Jesus said in the bible. The same is likely true regarding the other “apostles.” The Death Eaters now call Hitler Jewish and Zionist. Isn’t this similar? This itself is subversion from the other direction: the Death Eaters control both sides so that you have NO SIDE to turn to at all. It appears that their goal is to create utter hopelessness and detachment from everything except their Freemasonic ideology. Besides, Christianity opposes Liberal and Bolshevik behaviors, morals, and norms. This fact does not support Dobroslav’s argument. Why would the devil attack the devil? Bolshevism attacked and destroyed Christianity in Russia. Further, Christian families are amongst the most fertile in the Occident today. This is a stark contrast to feminist tenets, which advocate no children at all. Something is not adding up…

Hitler was not a sexist, contrary to popular Death Eater belief.

The rabbis have established themselves as slaveholders, while colluding popes voluntarily supply the slaves. Zionism arms its followers to the teeth, while Judeo-Christianity acts as its fifth column and morally disarms the herd.

Zionism relentlessly propagates the idea of the Chosen Ones; while Judeo-Christianity, in the name of “universal human rights”, does its best to eliminate even the faintest idea of a nation from the goyim’s consciousness. The Kahal encourages Jewish families to multiply without limit; while Judeo-Christianity nurtures a suicidal hatred towards marriage and the propagation of the goyim species, supporting abortion as a means to address “overpopulation” in order to diminish and finally destroy the continuity of goyim nations.

SS: Christian movements oppose abortion. Again, this argument is not adding up here…

In blatant chauvinism the Kahal jealously exhorts the Jews to maintain their racial purity; while elsewhere, tirelessly, facilitating mixed marriages and promiscuous extra marital sex to undermine the customs and moral traditions of nations. In this Judeo-Christianity cooperates with alacrity by removing the natural psychological barriers that discourage the mixing of species.

The cross breeding of incompatible species is unnatural and often dangerous. The purity of the blood is the most precious inheritance of a race; to defile it results in the loss of the connection to the protective spirits of ones ancestors.

SS: Not necessarily. Crypto-Jews are the second most powerful race of men on earth. Some race crossing is beneficial and perhaps even genetically necessary. The Jewish people have more psychological, neurological, and genetic diseases than any other race of people (fact). They are, by and far, the most “pure” around. Is this an evolutionary benefit? Hitler even said that the Jewish idea of racial purity could not be applied to Germans. He called it “impossible” and “incorrect.” Read the Otto Wagener memoirs yourself. Why did Hitler say this? Well, possibly because he wished to avoid becoming like a Jew himself. If peoples do not wish to be like the Jews, and revile and detest the supremacist, racist nature and laws of Jews, then why would one want to emulate them?

The Jews know full well that the purity of a race plays a decisive role in its ability to survive and in its continuity as a nation and that mixed marriages produce in general inferior offspring.

SS: Again, we agree with this to a point, but fanatical intrabreeding is maladaptive. The gene pool becomes too small and concentrated (basically incestual) to preserve the race in the long term. The Jews know this and that is likely why they initially crossed out in the first place. They probably also noticed that social and political perks went right along with this.

While the Jews destroy and defile the sacred symbols of other nations, they guard their own ones like the apple of the eye. The entire Jewish religion is nothing but a collection of laws intended to protect and maintain the Jewish race. Mixed marriages with members of other peoples and races are forbidden. From childhood on the rabbis drum it into Jewish heads that they, notwithstanding their faith, their language or place of birth are Jews by virtue of the purity of their blood, and members of the Chosen People. The members of all other peoples and races, however, are impure heathen creatures and it is a crime to mix the holy Jewish semen with theirs.

SS: Not all Jews adhere to this assessment. There are at least a few million Jews who have no affiliation at all with their religious symbols or culture. While there are very few who truly assimilate and take on the identity of their nation, there are still some out there. Many of the Jewish soldiers who fought for Nazi Germany fit this archetype — Erich von Manstein for instance.

Hitler awarding the Iron Cross First Class to a woman.

Already Moses punished the mixing of the Jews with the Moabites by death (4 book of Moses, 25). In the Talmud it is written: “The mixing with the goyim is sodomy” (Sanhedrin, 76b). In today’s Israel mixed marriages are not recognized by the rabbis.

The so-called “Jewish Question” is not a religious question, also not a question of the relationship between Judaism and Christianity, but solely racial one. It is a question of MUTUAL RACIAL INCOMPARABILITY. The Jews, as opposed to Christians, understand this perfectly well. They don’t hate the Christians for their faith (because they also know that Christianity is part of the Jewish conspiracy in disguise), but because the Christians are members of an incompatible species.

The Jews have managed to arouse in the righteous national instincts of all the peoples among whom they ever lived nothing but disgusted revulsion. In the Russian language there are more proverbs and figures of speech about Jews than in all other peoples’ languages together (matched perhaps only by the German language [translator]). Not one of these proverbs is positive. Not one! With his sly, pagan farmer’s intuition the Russian perceived the creeping danger right from the beginning.

The feeling of disgust and annoyance has its roots in the subconscious, that is, it’s a natural inherent reaction. It is a natural and healthy survival instinct (a subconsciously inherited experience), a predisposed defense mechanism in face of sickening viral and bacterial onslaughts.

The author of these lines is a zoological anti-Semite, and proud of it. That is because of the compelling animalistic, even elementary, detestation for the Jew as something impure and full of stench, which is the protective voice of mother nature itself.

In the final analysis anti-Semitism is a true bias, in the best sense of this word,  because it is older and more fundamental than rational thought. Such bias never deceives, because its fundamental wisdom is rooted in the very memory of the species.

Beware of black eyes, warns our folk wisdom. The picture of the dark, curly haired enemy with the hooked nose of a carnivore is an archetypical manifestation, firmly and inextinguishably anchored in the individual tribal subconscious of the Nordic peoples.

Asian Indian volunteers.

Every Russian, who has maintained his uncontaminated nature, is inevitably an anti-Semite. More, the measure of his anti-Semitism is simultaneously the measure of his honor, his dignity, his self esteem and his racial purity. The more clearly he is conscious of his own opposition to the menacing, alien principle (meaning the Jewish genome [translator]), the more determined he rejects it, the more honorable and dignified he is himself.

Only the self-soiling democrats in Russia’s big cities are delighted by the Jews. Like parasitic larvae they swarm in the sewers (the time is long overdue to transfer our capitol city to the North).

The question concerning the anthropological descent of the Jewish people remains open. Clear is only this: They are the descendants of cannibals. They are humanoid creatures of a totally alien species, who attempt with ape like grimaces to look like humans. One hesitates to designate them as animals. Why offend the innocent?

Still, the Jews exist not outside the creation, they are included in the cycles of nature. They simply are condemned rejects, secretions of nature, just as Jehova-Zeboat.

The Jews are the only creatures in the universe who curse the sun. They are walking dead who are unable to absorb the spiritual blessings of the sun, commonly known as soul. As the other peoples, subconscious sun worshippers, obtain their strength and inspiration from nature, the anemic Jews are dependent on cannibalizing the life forces of other peoples in order to keep themselves alive.

They are parasites in the deepest and most occult meaning of the word!

***

Asian Indian and Arabian volunteers.

It is a well known fact that the genetic makeup of half-breeds is often of an inferior quality: the mutual incompatibility of different types of blood leads to aberrations. Sober statistical research shows, that the offspring of mixed sexual relations between Jews and the white race displays tendencies of homosexuality, crime as well as psychological problems.

For the crossbreeding of the Chosen Ones with any other human race applies the law of the “Multiplication with Zero”. It means that the genes of the Jew are more dominant than that of a human, and from such relations always emerges a Jew that looks like a human. Just on the basis of their Jewish blood, they will always act in uncompromising opposition to humanity.

SS: We do agree that no one should cross with Death Eaters, because such an action allows the DEs to gain a solid foothold within the body of such-and-such folk. From a cost-benefits perspective there is far greater cost than benefit involved in such crossings.

These higgledy-piggledy organized half-breed ******** are the predestined disintegrators of nations. They hate the Russian component in their own blood and possess, because of their biological inferiority, no natural or patriotic attachments to any concept one could call home.

For easy indulgence of their swinish games, they blend into whatever is their current environment and camouflage their real names. Gagnus becomes Evtushenko, Selzer becomes Okudshavo and Zuckermann becomes Sacharov.

The racist Jew hides behind a cosmopolitan facade as long as he stays in a foreign country and promotes a cosmopolitan and pacifist agenda, while at home in Israel he drops all pretenses and becomes his true self, a racist and a militarist.

As they mingle abroad and inoculate their hosts with their own racial peculiarities, the Jews endeavor to mix all other peoples, except their own, to degrade them and to destroy their individuality. It’s noteworthy, that in the U.S.A. the most passionate proponents of multiculturalism are not the blacks, nor the whites, but predominantly the Jews and the half-breeds who contain Jewish blood.

Whenever it’s desired to infiltrate another country and to infect it with their cadaveric poison, for the purpose of disintegration, the “Sons of Zion”, underground agitators, are dispatched to facilitate, in manifold ways, the mixing of the races. A proven and most effective method is the insertion of “Queen Esthers” as wives and concubines for governmental advisers and national leaders (see Medvediev and Putin [HK]).

Foreign and ethnic minority Nazi soldiers were highly decorated and much appreciated by numerous Nazis, including Himmler & Hitler.

The Jews are quite familiar with what is known as “telegony”:

“Let’s not forget, that the entire offspring of the woman will always resemble that man with whom she had the very first sexual intercourse; even though it may have been unfruitful. That’s why we encourage our young bucks to be always and at all costs audacious and bold” (as per instruction of the ‘Wise Elders of Zion’, which they gave their punks after the failed Bar-Kochba-insurrection).

But when the peoples of the light races react to such scheming and conniving with protective measures to maintain their racial purity, the Jews commence a howl of unjust persecutions of their poor people, solely because of their extraordinary gifts and talents. Once again everything is turned upside down.

Vitriolic barks are the reaction to all of peoples’ attempts to maintain racial purity through the protective barriers that were established by nature herself, separating them from the circumcised Judaic tribe. Simultaneously, the opponents of multi culturalism are pronounced to be enemies of humanity — the common trick of the thief, who’s the first to cry “Hold the Thief!”

The Nuremberg racial laws, which made mixed marriages with Jews unlawful, in order to protect the racial purity of the German people, are being denounced as inhuman. They were in reality nothing but an answer to the Jews’ own laws and applied only to the Jews.

It was no coincidence, that the top German leadership was executed on the “Jewish Day of Revenge”, October 16, by hanging. There is no doubt about the ritual character of this execution. The real reason for the “settling of accounts” with the incarcerated German general staff was the so-called “persecution of the Jews” in National Socialist Germany.

Ordinary work camps for homosexuals, prostitutes, “democrats”, pimps, confidence men, speculators and similar refuse, became suddenly concentration camps for Jews, only because the majority of these criminals were of Jewish descent.

The Reich's Colonial Day celebration, 1938. The African WWI officer is wearing a Nazi armband. (Source: Bundesarchiv)

Hollywood went into overtime, producing film and photo forgeries. Mountains of the charred German corpses of Dresden — bombed and incinerated to its foundations — were being sold by Hollywood as “Jewish victims” of National Socialism; thus providing “credence” during the Nuremberg trial to the fabrication of “6 million murdered Jews”, based on nothing but perjuries, in total absence of all evidence.

These lies were already exposed in Richard Harwood’s book “Did 6 Million Really Die?” The historian Ditlieb Felderer was being confined in the psychiatric section of a Swedish penitentiary, because he exposed the lies of the 6 million. But then, who cares about Felderer? In Sweden they didn’t even shy away from incarcerating the octogenarian Knut Hamsun because he expressed his sympathy for the National Socialists.

 (Unforgettable are the words of this Nobel Peace Laureate for literature “I’m not worthy enough to speak about Adolf Hitler with a loud voice. . . He was a fighter for humanity and a harbinger of the message of justice for all nations. He was a reformer of the highest rank and his historical fate was that he had to act during a time of unparalleled baseness, which in the end destroyed him” [quoted by translator])

In 1984, the Californian Institute for Historical Review was bombed at night by unknown perpetrators, because it had dared to publish material which clearly showed that the number 6 million is grossly exaggerated. Other evidence proves that in none of the concentration camps existed the so-called “gas chambers.” Prior to the bombing, for quite a long time, the institute had offered a $50 000 reward for anyone who could supply evidence before court of ONE person who was exterminated in a concentration camp by gassing. However, until now nobody has been able to supply such evidence.

Bronislav Kaminski was half-Slavic (Polish) and half-German. He commanded at Warsaw.

It was practically impossible to execute such a giant mass murder without the allied secret services, the NKVD, the Vatican, not to mention the entire German people, knowing about it. Inspections carried out in September of 1944 by the Red Cross in Auschwitz, as well as in other concentration camps, didn’t produce the slightest trace of the infamous homicidal gas chambers. Questioning of thousands of former inmates by the Red Cross and the Vatican immediately after the war produced not the slightest hint of any gassings.

The so-called confessions from former camp guards and commanders of concentration camps, obtained later, were extracted under sadistic tortures by Jewish U.S. investigators. (In other cases, also ordinary soldiers were tortured. In a post facto investigation by the U.S. senate of the case Malmedy alone, 139 cases of irreparably smashed genitals were recorded)

The pious David had the population of an entire city burned by throwing them into furnaces ALIVE (2. book Samuel, 12). The Kahal is wont to unload its own massive atrocities onto its enemies, sells black for white and white for black and has the gall to claim its own murderers to be victims of National Socialism, while throwing hysterical fits about the crematoria.

Hermetic chambers in which typhus infested clothing was fumigated had to double as murder weapon. In them, the chemical Zyklon B was used to fight typhus. On the doors of these chambers were signs saying Caution Gas! Danger to life! Do not open! THOSE WERE THE FAMOUS GAS CHAMBERS. Professor Faurisson, prominent French historian and holocaust researcher of Lyon University has proven their utter uselessness as homicidal gas chambers.

In Germany, Police disperses occasionally demonstrators, whose faces are hidden behind masks of donkeys, carrying signs saying I believe that there were gas chambers.

* * *

More foreign Nazi soldiers.

The Jews’ limitless ill-will towards all peoples and the world that keeps challenging and exposing the Kahal’s conspiracies with open sights grows exponentially as long as the truth about them remains undefeated.

The real life story of Adolf Hitler hasn’t been written yet, because this requires a person who resembles him in heart and mind. Only a great spirit can understand another great spirit fully. Adolf Hitler was a leader and spiritual trail blazer, whose political career and whole life was a sacred and religious effort in the service of a supra-individual idea.

SS: Absolutely. In fact, Hitler’s biographer has to be a woman, not a man. Irving did a decent job, but he failed to capture the personality, creativeness, and very essence of Hitler and his mission. Brigitte Hamann came much closer (in Hitler’s Vienna), though she had to mask her feelings to make it through the censorship process. Hitler’s biographer has to be a German woman who actually admires and loves him and appreciates what he did. Hopefully one will come along soon.

He combined in himself an astounding degree of mystical wisdom with realism; a blazing, ecstatic jubilation with cool and calculating rationality; deeply felt standards of honor with conscientiousness and unbending will power, compassion with moral integrity.

“An exalted life must be crowned by an exalted death,” was once remarked by Seneca. But the Wagner hasn’t been born yet, who could appropriately immortalize him in the sung eulogy of a hero and his heroine, who obtained immortality in Valhalla.

Under Hitler’s governance Germany achieved its independence from international bankers, thus setting a practical example for other peoples. This was extremely dangerous for the Kahal, that’s why it moved heaven and earth to unleash a new world war, with the long term aim to also involve the USSR and its Slavic cannon fodder to destroy Hitler.

The aim was the total destruction of Germany, while simultaneously to run down and deplete the life force of the eastern slaves. Already in 1914 these instigators staged the provocation of Sarajevo to induce two mighty powers, the German and Russian empires, to fight each other towards a complete state of attrition.

With WW II the instigators succeeded anew to unleash hostilities between the most powerful and vigorous people, the Germans and the Slavs, with the intention to bleed both dry. Who profited by this? The completely Judaized U.S.A. profited, which endeavored to establish a new world order on the ruins of the exhausted nations. WW II was lost by the Germans as well as the Russians; win did THE ETERNAL JEW alone. His crimes against humanity he simply transferred to German Fascism in a never ending propaganda campaign. Once again the truth was turned upside down.

Unlike Anglos, the Nazis were TOLERANT of religious diversity.

Because it was flirting with world domination and needed to instigate for this purpose a new blood bath, Zionism interpreted the German desire for reunification with the areas stolen by the Treaty of Versailles as proof of alleged German efforts to obtain world domination; i.e. Zion once again has credited its own nefarious designs to those WHO STAND IN ITS WAY OF OBTAINING THEM.

The indictments of Nuremberg were based on the so-called Hosbach Protokoll of the year 1937 (proven to be a forgery), which was used as evidence for Hitler’s alleged preparations for a new world war. Unfortunately, nobody was able to produce this protocol, neither in the original nor as a copy. In this bald faced manner was a monstrous lie fabricated.

Hitler had neither a European war nor a world war in mind. For this the Third Reich just didn’t have the technical or military ability, and within German policies there weren’t the slightest hints about any intentions for war.

The so-called annexation of Czechoslovakia was nothing but a justified correction of the injustices of the Versailles peace treaty, which stank to high heaven. It was forced upon Europe by the war mongers of the Kahal. Through the juristically flawless Munich Agreement 3 million Sudeten Germans obtained independence.

Yamashita (from Japan) visits with Nazi officials.

Hitler was supposed to have invaded Poland? Before that, Germany had made repeatedly territorial demands (Danzig and the Polish corridor). German-Polish relations came to a head in a military conflict, because this conflict had been provoked by England. Only three days prior to the German-Polish war Hitler offered the British ambassador in Berlin a peaceful solution for the Polish question. His proposal was rejected because the Jewish government of England WANTED WAR.

Only after Hitler had lost all hope for a peaceful resolution of the conflict, was he forced to opt for a military solution. But England, France and the U.S.A. expanded a conflict, which should have been limited solely to Germany and Poland and which was nobody else’s business, into a WORLD WAR. When one views the matter from a juristical position it is clear that WW II was begun by England and France when they declared war on Hitler in 1939.

Unbiased historians have long ago recognized who the guilty parties were for the outbreak of WW II, most prominent among them Professor David Hoggan in his work The Forced War.

In the mutual Soviet-German declaration of September 28, 1939, we read, that with the division of Poland a stable basis was created for a lasting peace in East Europe and that the responsibility for any expansion of the war is to be found solely with England and France.

During 1939 there seemed to develop a natural pact between two independent anti capitalistic powers, the USSR and the German Reich, against the international plutocracy. Hitler didn’t want any war with Russia. As an admirer of Bismarck he upheld the legacy of the Iron Chancellor: “Germany has no enemies in the East.”

Are you going to fight on the right side this time? Or will you continue to fight for the reign of the DEATH EATER PUREBLOODS?

Adolf Hitler was anything but a narrow minded racist, although some in his inner circle were. “The pride of his own race does not imply a contempt for other races,” said Hitler to Bormann. It goes without saying, that the chimeras of Hitler’s alleged conviction, that all Slavic and finno-ugric peoples are subhuman, are nothing else but obvious provocations by the Jews. Had this been the truth, over a million Russians would never have fought, side by side, with the German soldiers. Such a phenomenon had never before taken place in all of history.

The Vlassov soldiers and the Cossacks did not fight for the Germans, but for their homeland. It wasn’t a coincidence that the slogan of the Russian Liberation (Vlassov) Army is identical with the motto of the Kronstadt sailors, the leader of the peasant rebellion, Alexander Antonov, or with the Sibirian partisans: “We are for the Soviet government, but without Jews and commissars!”

The true Russian patriots saw in the German Reich only a necessary and temporary ally; similarly to Japan, who was an ally to the fighters of the Indian National Army, or the Indonesian Armed Forces in their fight against the English. These fighters are honored by their countries as heroes.

Long before the outbreak of war Hitler warned Stalin, whom he regarded as an outstanding historical personality, that the Anglo-American imperialism was an inexorable enemy of National Socialist Germany as well as the Soviet Union.

Hitler tried to win Stalin as an ally, to make common cause against the international conspiracy; all the more, as the geopolitical interests of both powers in no way interfered with one another. On November 12, 1940, Hitler proposed to Stalin, via Molotov, to join the axis Berlin, Rome, Tokyo, to divide the global spheres of influence among each other (including the colonies of Britain). The draft of the secret agreement of the USSR’s joining the Three Powers Pact stated: “The Soviet Union declares that her main interests extend towards the areas to the South, in direction of the Indian Ocean.”

Africans and Asians under Nazi occupation in France (likely POWs). Hundreds-of-thousands of these men and other POWs joined Nazi forces or helped them build Western fortifications. All were paid.

By and large, Molotov found the idea of a Russian-German cooperation agreeable, and informed Stalin about it. But the conspirators behind the scenes were alert, because this matter became for them a question of life and death.

The Jews in Stalin’s immediate circle, the agents, Western diplomats as well secret services, succeeded to drive a wedge into these endeavors. The relation between both states was overshadowed by suspicions. Its climate became noticeably frigid and in 1939 the attempted moves towards closer diplomatic ties ended abruptly. Stalin rejected any cooperation altogether. Hitler now realized that a war couldn’t be avoided anymore and began with the necessary preparations.

The Jews realized that only the primordial power of the Russian bear had a chance to topple Hitler from power. The Soviet Union was viewed by them as the smaller evil in comparison to the axis powers, which had set themselves the target to free humanity from the Jewish yoke (the symbols of the second world war reveal significant similarities: the white (American) and the red (soviet) star, also both sides of the cabalistic seal of Solomon, united against the symbol of the sun — the swastika and the flag of Japan).

The Kahal spared no effort to drive Moscow and Berlin into war. But Hitler answered Stalin’s intentions with resolve and speed.

The most unforgivable trait of this giant of spirit was his moral superiority. Mediocrity can’t stand anything and nobody above itself.

“The hour is measured by the length of the shadows, but great leaders by the number of their slanderers”, says an Eastern proverb. One can’t express ones own insignificance more clearly, when one pours buckets of offal upon a fallen titan. It arouses especially revulsion when moral midgets grow a little beard, a la Fuehrer, but simultaneously, tremblingly, disown their idol.

In recent times many works of research appeared about German National Socialism, which oozed with pathological hatred for Hitler. This indicates clearer than anything else that these revealers are Jews, even if they are only to a quarter or an eighth Jews. In this way they clearly expose their true grimace.

It is generally known that there is no better way to degrade the brightest and shiniest ideas, than to ridicule them: “the Etruscans were Russian” or “when there is no water coming from a faucet the Jews must have drunk it all” (Russian rhyme and proverb that makes fun of all those who blame the Jews for everything [translator])

The spy and deserter G. Klimov claims in all seriousness, that Hitler and his closest colleagues were one and all Jews and half Jews. Yeah, right! And besides that they were also freemasons, perverts, cabalists, Zionists and were financed by Jewish financiers. As source Klimov refers to the research results of some Jews, among them those of Arthur Koestler, who considers himself to be a Kazarian Jew.

The Leader in 1941. (Bundesarchiv)

Once one has become familiar with Klimov’s nonsense, it becomes clear that it is nothing but quackery and paranoid gossip, amplified by his homosexual inclinations.

Something is mystifying in this: why these and similar works are published in Russian papers and periodicals, of all places, and even in the publications of the Russian National Liberation movement.

It is perfectly obvious that behind all those invectives about Adolf Hitler, a man who carried within himself the will of the nation to resist, hides the Kahal’s compulsion to defile the IDEA OF NATIONAL REBIRTH AND SELF-DETERMINATION.

In the final analysis, the idea of the National Liberation Movement is being undermined by people from within its own ranks.

WHAT GIVES?! IS IT MERELY THOUGHTLESSNESS OR IS IT MALICIOUS INTENT?

* * *

Our enemies accuse us of provoking a civil war. But isn’t it true that it is in reality already raging all over Russia? Only, it’s being carried on entirely one sided: it’s the Russians alone whose rights are being diminished, who are being persecuted and knifed everywhere. The only thing permitted for them is to die without defending themselves.

The more the people are impoverished, the more coercively is it forced by the pro-American and pro-Jewish administration to accept the Russian-orthodox religion. It doesn’t pay pensions, it doesn’t pay wages, it lets schools and hospitals run down, but it does build churches, so the slaves can worship their tormentors.

THOSE WHO COUNSEL PEACE, WHEN IT IS REALLY TIME TO FIGHT, WORK FOR THE ENEMY!

It is the obligation of the Russian National Socialists to give the primal forces of the people’s anger a direction. It is their obligation, to save Mother Russia from the final collapse, and the Russian people from extinction.

Our victory cannot be prevented and will soon stand radiant in the light of the sun, because the fight of the plundered working class against the capitalist yoke is irrepressibly driven by the self confident awakening of the Russian spirit, who has been, once too often, carelessly trampled into the ground.

This essay brought to you by VSS. Thank you Hans!

5 Feb 2010, Comments (0)

Hitler’s Health: Theory vs. Fact

Author: Sirius Black
No Gravatar

In the book, the authors claim to have found no evidence for a cocaine or methamphetamine habit, a single testicle, deformation or hypnosis therapy gone wrong. In the end, they conclude that Hitler had Parkinson’s disease and that his declining health was obvious in the final months leading up to his suicide in April 1945. Nevertheless, they write, “at no time did Hitler suffer from pathological delusions.” In fact, they conclude that [he] was always aware of his actions: “He was fully responsible.”

by Christoph Gunkel

Source: http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,druck-675991,00.html

There are myriad theories out there about Hitler’s health. Some say he was a drug addict, others say he was the victim of a hypnosis gone wrong. Then there are the strange hypotheses about his genitalia. A new book, however, debunks most such ideas. Drugs and illness, the authors conclude, had little effect on his actions.

…Adolf Hitler had a downright fatherly relationship with his personal physician. “My dear doctor, I so look forward to seeing you in the morning!” the Nazi dictator told his doctor, Theodor Morell, whom he trusted implicitly. In fact, Hitler was convinced that Morell had saved his life on several occasions. “My dear doctor!” the despot said to Morell in November 1944, “if we both make it through the war in one piece, you will see how generously I’ll reward you!”

"Hitler's personal physician, Theodor Morell, was known to have given him large amounts of medications. For example, Hitler took such massive amounts of a drug to combat flatulence that some of his other physicians even speculated that he was being poisoned. The drug contained small amounts of the nerve agent strychnine, which had long been used as a rat poison." (Der Spiegel)

Traudl Junge, who was Hitler’s private secretary during the war, later said that he was “utterly addicted to Morell.” Ironically, however, the doctor didn’t enjoy the best of reputations. When Eva Braun, Hitler’s longtime companion, complained about Morell’s poor bodily hygiene, Hitler stubbornly defended his personal physician, saying: “Morell isn’t here to be smelled, but to keep me healthy.”

But it was precisely Morell’s ability to treat his patient that those in Hitler’s inner circle questioned. For example, General Heinz Guderian called Morell a “fat, unappetizing quack,” and Hermann Göring, the morphine-addicted commander of the Luftwaffe, disparagingly referred to Morell as the “Reich syringe master.” Likewise, there were persistent rumors that the doctor had made Hitler dependent on certain medications and illicit drugs.

SB: Goering became an addict during World War I. Unfortunately millions of soldiers treated with morphine became addicts. Since neuroscience did not yet exist, no one understood how the brain rearranged itself to accommodate addictive substances, which reinforced addictions (along with context of course; environment plays a significant role in addiction).

Even after the war, hardly any aspect of Hitler’s private life fueled as much speculation as his physical ailments. Generations of historians, psychologists, psychiatrists and amateur sleuths have sought to uncover Hitler’s real and imagined illnesses. To them, it seemed only logical that the irrational raging of a man who ordered millions of Jews, Roma and myriad others to be murdered was the outgrowth of a sick mind. Of course, the theory went, Hitler must have been somehow traumatized, a drug addict or even mentally ill!

Theories Abound

Many facile theories were proposed soon after the war. Hitler was alternatively said to be either gay or schizophrenic. Some thought he had suffered for decades from the consequences of a hypnosis treatment gone wrong. His penis was said to be as stunted as his self-esteem, and the Führer allegedly had only one testicle and had contracted syphilis. There were claims that he was constantly high on illicit drugs and popped pills with abandon. Does this mean we’re supposed to understand Hitler as the addict par excellence of the Third Reich — and his personal physician as his main dealer?

Oh the LIES that abound: "Some have theorized that Hitler was gay or schizophrenic. Others have thought he suffered for decades from the consequences of a hypnosis treatment gone wrong while being treated for injuries incurred in World War I at a military hospital in Pasewalk (pictured here). His penis was said to be as stunted as his self-esteem, and the Führer allegedly had only one testicle and had contracted syphilis. There were claims that he was constantly high on illicit drugs and popped pills with abandon, which might have made him have pathological delusions." (Der Spiegel)

Such attempts to explain Hitler’s behavior are dangerous, of course. Should he be found to have had an unsound mind, wouldn’t it mean that he could be held only partially responsible for the millions of deaths he ordered? Holocaust denier David Irving, for example, claims that medical mistakes induced Hitler into “euphoric trances,” thereby suggesting that the dictator was more or less unaware of his actions.

On the other hand, serious academics have asked valid questions about Hitler’s health and, indeed, part of the mystery lies in the paucity of significant source material available. After the war, Hitler’s medical files disappeared, and the only evidence left were notes taken by his personal physician and eyewitness accounts.

Now, however, in their new book “War Hitler Krank?” (“Was Hitler Ill?”), historian Henrik Eberle and Hans-Joachim Neumann, a professor emeritus of medicine at Berlin’s Charité University Hospital, have combined the use of documentary material with modern medical analysis to separate myth from verifiable facts. The book purports to offer nothing short of “conclusive findings” on Hitler’s state of health. It also reveals quite a few ghastly details about the dictator. For example, it posits that Hitler may have had tooth fillings made of dental gold taken from Jewish concentration camp victims: His dentist had more than 50 kilograms (110 pounds) of the material in his possession.

SB: This is nonsense. Where is the evidence that it was from Jews? Where is the evidence that the dentist actually even had the gold? Nuremberg? Such nonsense could have easily been planted by the Allies. Think about this: Imagine the tiny amount of gold one would get from just one mouth — then trying to melt that down to reuse? We want proof and Jewish eyewitnesses do not count. Anyone can make up a story.

Testosterone for Eva

The two authors meticulously list all 82 medications<~~~the REAL problem, mixing and matching so many medications! that historical documents say Hitler took during the course of his rule. The list shows that Morell was more than willing to cater to his patient’s every desire. For example, he routinely administered a solution of dextrose and vitamins to help Hitler combat fatigue. Because Hitler was skeptical of pills and capsules, the solution was injected intravenously or intramuscularly.

In 1944, Morell began giving him injections of the testosterone, particularly when Eva Braun was around. They also posit that, before his rendezvous with Braun, Hitler occasionally had Morell inject an extract derived from the seminal vesicles and prostate glands of young bulls into his bloodstream.

Morell’s notes also reveal that the man who considered himself to be the greatest military leader of all time suffered from several everyday fears and ailments. He was terrified of getting cancer. After having literally shouted his way into power, he was constantly hoarse and had polyps removed from his vocal chords twice. He had high blood pressure and chronic gastrointestinal cramps, and he was also relatively squeamish. When he caught a cold once from his personal barber, Hitler raged: “The man has had the sniffles for five days, and he doesn’t even tell me!”

Rat Poison and ‘Hitler Speed’

Hitler’s digestion problems even prompted him to become a vegetarian: Contrary to what the Nazi propaganda machine would have one believe, it wasn’t because Germany’s dictator was an animal lover. Likewise, he took such massive amounts of a drug to combat flatulence that some of his other physicians even speculated that he was being poisoned. The drug contained small amounts of the nerve agent strychnine, which had long been used as a rat poison.

SB: Next-to-nothing was known about medicine back then, so this has to be considered with that context in mind. There are competing theories about Hitler’s vegetarianism, one of which claimed that he became a vegetarian after seeing the dead body (during the autopsy) of his step-niece, Geli Raubal.

Moreover, when Hitler exhibited symptoms of jaundice in the fall of 1944, a heated debate erupted among his physicians, fueled, no doubt, by a desire to curry favor. Some even accused their colleague Morell of having poisoned Hitler. But the dictator stood by his personal physician, dismissing Morell’s detractors as “fools” and even having two of them transferred elsewhere.

Was Hitler an Addict?

Today, almost six and a half decades after Hitler’s death, Eberle and Neumann have attempted to solve the mystery of whether Morell’s treatment of Hitler was, in fact, improper. By analyzing the composition and dosage of the drug Morell administered to Hitler, they’ve ruled out the possibility of poisoning. They conclude that Morell was probably correct in diagnosing Hitler’s hepatitis as having been triggered by blockage around his gall bladder.

Such findings might indicate that Morell was actually a competent physician rather than the “quack” or “Rasputin” he has been accused of being. However, this conclusion seems to be contradicted by the fact that Morell hardly dared to deny Hitler any of his wishes and supplied him with large numbers of pills, including the stimulant Pervitin. Such behavior triggered accusations that Morell got Hitler hooked on drugs — not implausible given the fact that several members of the Nazi elite were also drug addicts (SB: Name them. Goering is the only one I can think of). Likewise, German soldiers fighting on the front consumed large quantities of Pervitin, and the drug was even added to chocolates. Nowadays, the substance is an ingredient in the popular drug crystal meth, which is also known by the telltale nickname “Hitler speed.”

SB: What they don’t tell you is that L-Dopa is a modern day form of methamphetamine and it’s used as a Parkinson’s treatment. Hitler had Parkinson’s and Morell noticed that this drug alleviated Hitler’s symptoms. Modern day methamphetamine is NOT the same as it was back then – it is COMPLETELY different. Pervitin was not rat poison, bleach, and whatever other street chemical one wanted to put in it. It was a legitimate drug treatment. They merely say “meth” to paint Hitler in an “evil” and “bad” light. It’s just more anti-Hitler nonsense. I think most of us can tell the difference between a tweeker (pardon the slang) and a pill popper, or a person with a prescription drug addiction.

Still, Morell’s notes only contain a single reference to his having administered Pervitin to Hitler. Some would like to believe that the complicated abbreviations in Morell’s notes or his descriptions of other, harmless concoctions are merely covers for a medication containing the addictive drug. But Eberle and Neumann are highly skeptical: “There is no indication that Hitler was only able to conduct his daily briefings because he was taking Pervitin.” They also note that there is little evidence that Hitler had a cocaine habit, as some have suspected.

Bitten by a Goat?

Eberle and Neumann also attempt to debunk other myths by pointing out just how thin and contradictory the source material is and raising questions based on medical analysis. One story, for example, speculates that Hitler’s fits of rage and megalomania were merely the result of an untreated case of meningitis. Likewise, Eberle and Neumann were unable to find any evidence that Hitler was missing a testicle or that his penis was deformed after allegedly being bitten by a goat in his younger days.

SB: Honestly, only a Death Eater historian would invent such tripe. One cannot trust ANYTHING a DE historian wrote or writes. They have put out too many lies and fabrications to take seriously any longer. They have made a mockery of scholarship.

They also dismiss as “absurd” the theory of historian Bernhard Horstmann, who posits that Hitler’s personality was drastically altered in 1918 during a session of hypnosis therapy because the therapist failed to wake him up from a trance. As a lance corporal in World War I, Hitler was temporarily blinded after a mustard-gas attack. He went on to receive hypnosis therapy in a military hospital in the northeastern German town of Pasewalk.

Keep putting out those lies and we'll keep debunking them. At VSS, the truth be told.

Conspiracy theorists reading Eberle and Neumann’s book will likely be disappointed by the authors’ findings about Hitler’s supposed illnesses. In the end, they conclude that Hitler had Parkinson’s disease and that his declining health was obvious in the final months leading up to his suicide in April 1945. Nevertheless, they write, “at no time did Hitler suffer from pathological delusions.” In fact, they conclude that the despot was always aware of his actions: “He was fully responsible.”

Strange Advice

Regardless of their findings, Hitler’s decisions did remain impulsive, inexplicable and contemptuous of human life to the very end. Eventually, even Hitler’s “dear Doctor” Morell must have realized this. Even after Germany’s defenses had fallen apart on all fronts and the war was already lost, Hitler’s personal physician stoically attended to his patient’s blood pressure, stomach cramps and digestive problems in Hitler’s bunker in Berlin. Ultimately, Hitler thanked Morell in his own way. On April 21, 1945, he dismissed his loyal physician from the bunker and sent him on his way with a strange piece of advice: He told Morell to return to his practice on Kurfürstendamm.

Meanwhile, just outside his bunker, the last remnants of Germany’s military were battling the Red Army as it fought its way into central Berlin, the capital of the Third Reich.

Translated from the German by Christopher Sultan

SB: See http://www.virtualseverussnape.org/?p=188 for more on Hitler’s Parkinson’s and the drug Pervitin.

This news article brought to you by VSS.

No Gravatar

This is the economic result of true racism and supremacism. Death Eaters are the ones losing the game, due to ethnocultural ignorance and arrogance. Didn’t they learn from Wormtail’s (Churchill’s) mistakes?

No amount of bread and circus can change the impending economic and cultural collapse that is coming to America and Israel both. Let’s just hope we survive it, Order members.

This excellent video brought to you by VSS.

No Gravatar

These are scans from David Baldacci’s The Whole Truth.

Please click this image and read it. Hitler warned us once, and here it is AGAIN. The Death Eaters will never stop hunting us.

Left click the image (if you cannot read it here).

 This information brought to you by VSS.

No Gravatar

by David Cowan | February 3, 2010

Source: http://www.daily49er.com/news/students-call-for-removal-of-psychology-professor-1.2156180

Kauffman<~~~DEATH EATER and others were protesting MacDonald’s membership in the American Third Option party, which is said by some to be rooted in white nationalism.

"Tenured professor Kevin MacDonald says he just wants to teach, regardless of his political views."

In the past week, psychology professor Kevin MacDonald had his class interrupted by an organization claiming his views and recent involvement in political organization the American Third Option party are seen as racist and anti-Semitic.

MacDonald, a tenured professor at Cal State Long Beach, has been making headlines on the matter since he was investigated by the Southern Poverty Law Center in 2006. The SPLC tracks hate crimes and groups across America.

“I’m used to being harassed,” MacDonald said. “I expect to be harassed because people on the left don’t like what I think. So what? We should be allowed to teach.”

Senior English major Doug Kauffman was one of the students who led the demonstration in MacDonald’s class last Tuesday.

"Senior English major Doug Kauffman (DEATH EATER), left, confronts professor Kevin MacDonald last Tuesday during his class in the Liberal Arts 4 building."

“We planned this [demonstration] at least a month in advance; the goal would be to have every student just get up and walk out,” Kauffman said.

Marylou Cabral<~~~DEATH EATER, a senior art education major and participant in the demonstration, commented on the student’s reactions.

“Many seemed appalled, and I think a few even left,” Cabral said. “Our goal is to let students know about [MacDonald’s] involvement in Freedom 14 and other neo-Nazi groups. We feel that the students need to know what they’re getting into.”

Both Kauffman and Cabral are students at CSULB and members of the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL), a Marxist and Leninist organization that advocates revolutionary change and progressive reform.

MacDonald is a member and listed as a director of the American Third Option party, or A3P. The A3P — whose slogan is “Liberty. Sovereignty. Identity.” — is said to be rooted in white nationalism. The A3P is currently on the list of non-qualified political parties but is intending to qualify as a ballot-accessible party by June.

“Any third party is a long shot,” MacDonald said. “My view is not so much that it would get people elected, but to raise consciousness on issues like immigration that should be discussed honestly.”

Several faculty members at CSULB are involved in politics and have no guilt about showing their political radicalism, MacDonald said.

“If you look at professors, they are far to the left of the average voter; they are far to the left of people who are similarly educated but go into different fields,” MacDonald said. “All the surveys show that they’re way to the left of just about any identifiable group that you can imagine, and so that’s an important historical question that has to be discussed.”

The Department of Psychology issued a statement on its Web page in 2008, saying that they “respect and defend his right to express his views, but we affirm that they are his alone and are in no way endorsed by the Department of Psychology at California State University, Long Beach.”

The department has since disassociated itself from MacDonald and his writings and is not alone, as other departments, including anthropology and history, have done so as well.

In 2008, the Academic Senate approved a written document disassociating itself from MacDonald. The document stated: “While the Academic Senate defends Dr. Kevin MacDonald’s academic freedom and freedom of speech, as it does for all faculty, it firmly and unequivocally condemns and disassociates itself from the anti-Semitic and white ethnocentric views he has expressed.”

SS: “White” is not an ethnicity. It is a skin pigment that can be traced to several gene mutations in Europe thousands of years ago. Look it up. Germans, Slavs, Anglos, Jews, etc., are all different ethnic groups who just so happen to have “white” skin. There are white Arabs, white Africans (Albinism), white Asians (Albinism), etc.

Some called on the university to do the same.

In an April 11, 2008, e-mail sent to the Daily 49er, CSULB President F. King Alexander wrote that “despite the fact that I personally disagree and even find deplorable some beliefs and opinions expressed by a few individuals on our campus, particularly those ideas that are hurtful of certain groups, I believe as Thomas Jefferson stated, that ‘errors of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it.’”

Alexander further explained that the university is a forum itself. “Universities should also be firmly committed, even at times when it is against popular opinion, to freedom of thought and when we act to restrict opinions from the far right or the far left, then it will not be long before we can no longer call ourselves a university.”

And in his most recent statement to the Daily 49er, on June 20, 2008, Alexander said that, “[MacDonald's] views and opinions in no way represent the views of this university in any aspect whatsoever.”

The thesis of MacDonald’s books and papers claims that conflicts in society are based in ethnic interests and activism.

“The idea is that the construction of culture has been influenced by ethnic activism,” MacDonald said. “And I of course focus on Jewish groups. Jews tend to be elite; they tend to be involved in intellectual movements.”

After becoming A3P director, MacDonald resurfaced as the subject of several articles by OC Weekly’s “¡Ask a Mexican!” columnist Gustavo Arellano, who discussed MacDonald’s views and gathered reactions from students and members of the Associated Students Inc.

The articles led to a one-hour radio program on KPFK last Thursday, during which Arellano spoke of MacDonald’s work, which he said claims that “Jews are undermining Western civilization” and the A3P’s “primary plank is to deport all non-whites and that homosexuality should be suppressed.”

MacDonald responded to Arellano in his own blog Friday morning, saying:

“Arellano begins by baldly asserting that A3P and I advocate deportation of all non-whites, including African-Americans and every other group, legal or illegal, no matter how long they or their ancestors have been here.

“Not only that, he claims that A3P advocates suppression of all LBGT’s (lesbian, bisexual, gay and transgender, for those not in the loop of leftist acronyms). (For the record, my position is that gays and other sexual minorities have ethnic interests just like everyone else). For these supposed crimes, he advocates that I be fired from my academic position.”

Arellano also spoke by phone to ASI President Chris Chavez and former ASI presidential candidate Raul Preciado during the program, discussing what action CSULB is taking regarding MacDonald.

“This has been a perennial thorn in the side of the university,” Chavez said. “This has been an issue, but primarily a faculty issue.”

Chavez went on to discuss the difficulty of firing a tenured professor. However, MacDonald’s move to the directorship of the A3P may have “upped the ante,” Chavez said. “Now you’re going from belief to action.”

While no plan is in motion at this time, the message from ASI was made clear.

“We want to let him know that we don’t want people who are spreading his views on campus,” Preciado said.

The placement of MacDonald to his new position also works into the goals of the PSL to remove MacDonald from campus.

“We’re going to re-start a petitioning campaign to get him off campus. One of the key elements will be this recent development,” Kauffman said. “One petition to support his dismissal and one to support the nonparticipation in his class; we would like to get student groups and faculty to pressure him to leave campus. This is going to take a strong effort to remove him from class.”

SS: Dear readers & Order members, are we going to sit by and do nothing? The university’s contact information is:

California State University, Long Beach
1250 Bellflower Boulevard
Long Beach, California 90840
Phone: 562.985.4111

This news article brought to you by VSS.

No Gravatar

by Veronica Clark, M.A.

Source: http://www.jotrh.org/

Japanese officials meet with Hitler.

Japan was not a fascist country at any point in its history, including the period from 1931-1945. While the Japanese state did exhibit some of the traits that most Americans would consider ”fascist,” which is defined below, the reality is that the Japanese government was a traditional oligarchy.

Oligarchy is defined in the following terms by Princeton’s WordNet: “a political system governed by a few people.” (http://wordnet. princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=oligarchy)

Historian Bonnie B. Oh, in her essay “Meiji Imperialism: ‘Phenomenally Rapid’,” described Japan’s government prior to the time period in question as “oligarchic.” (126) This is important because no political system can be considered without understanding its historical context. To understand the Japanese government from 1931 to 1945, one must first understand the context and system that preceded it.

Japanese officials with Hitler.

So, what exactly is “fascism”? The American Heritage Dictionary (a biased source) defines fascism in the following terms: “A philosophy or system of government that is marked by stringent social and economic control, a strong, centralized government usually headed by a dictator, and often a policy of belligerent nationalism.” (http://www2.truman. edu/~marc/resources/terms.html) Princeton’s WordNet defines the term a bit differently: “fascism – a political theory advocating an authoritarian hierarchical government (as opposed to democracy or liberalism).” (http://wordnet.

princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=fascism) While these definitions help little with understanding precisely what fascism is — i.e., these definitions could just as easily characterize an oligarchy or even a monarchy — they do provide us with an idea, and that must suffice.

Now, let us revisit Oh’s assessment. She stated the following about the Meiji political situation (again, which preceded the Japanese political scene just prior to the period in question — i.e., the late 1800s):

“…for those who had won out in power struggles, successful personal and group performance was a requirement. Thus it was natural that a member of the oligarchy could neither insist nor implement it. The result is an appearance of harmony and unanimity of opinion which historians are now discovering to be the consequence only of long deliberation and a series of compromises.” (128)

Given these dynamics, the idea of Japanese fascism fails to recognize that Japanese policymakers deliberated and compromised. Did this situation dramatically change between 1931 and 1945? One has reason to doubt that one man came to make all of the decisions without any independent input from others during the time period in question, especially since no such individual was accused of so doing (during the Allied military tribunals), including the Emperor. The military clique making the most important decisions at the time was an oligarchic military clique, remnant of the bushi/samurai cliques of ‘medieval’ Japan, not a single military or political dictator (though some might try and argue that Tojo Hideki was like a dictator, since he supposedly controlled the entire Japanese military). The bottom line is that taken together all of these facts accord with traditional Japanese political, governmental, and military developments and institutions rather than with Eurocentric authoritarian principles of government (e.g., Stalin) — i.e., orders made by a single tyrant (who decides when to listen to the advice of his loyal servants) and handed down. Dictators are not known for their role as compromisers or for being flexible.

Oh goes on to say that

“The end product of this group leadership was therefore flexibility in response to a situation regardless of the basic goals.” (Ibid.)

We will now look at the actual time period in question to see whether or not Japan’s government was truly fascist. But before we do that, addressing some of the empirical and logistical problems associated with the term is necessary. Historians Peter Duus and Daniel Okimoto essentially argued that the term fascism hardly suffices as an accurate term for defining the governments of either Germany or Italy, let alone the government of Japan in the 1930s. These two have summarized the findings of European historian Gilbert Allardyce, who concluded that applying the fascist definition even to Italy and Germany is just not feasible. (“Comment: Fascism and the History of Pre-War Japan: The Failure of a Concept,” The Journal of Asian Studies 39, no. 1, (Nov., 1979), 66)

Already we see two examples of the rather serious historiographical discrepancies associated with the term fascism and how it might best be applied to describe government, if at all. Historian Miles Fletcher came to a similar conclusion, stating that the analyses of three prominent Japanese historians — Maruyama, Toyama and Ouci — revealed “just how difficult it is to apply the concept of fascism to pre-war Japan at the level of political institutions… Because the regime was oppressive, all three scholars agree that Japan was fascist.” (“Intellectuals and Fascism in Early Showa Japan,” The Journal of Asian Studies 39, no. 1, (Nov., 1979), 40)

However, if oppression is what these historians use as their measure of what constitutes fascism, then any number of democracies, oligarchies, and dictatorships could be characterized as fascist. Canada and the US today can be said to have oppressed their Muslim citizens via racial profiling and phone tapping; likewise, both states have oppressed many of their citizens by attacking free speech via political correctness. So now it seems that one has to measure degree and kind of oppression as opposed to just oppression. In this case the Soviet Union, throughout its entire existence, was fascist: it was extremely oppressive against its citizens and murdered or imprisoned millions of them without justifiable cause.

According to Fletcher, historian Hayashi Kentaro pointed out the differences between National Socialist Germany and Japan, in order to prove that Japan was not fascist. Kentaro concluded “that there were no similarities between the institutions of Nazi Germany and those of early Showa Japan.” (Ibid., 40) Furthermore, Kentaro brought up the fact that Japan in the 1930s had no “single mass party…[that served] as an analogue to the National Socialist Party in Germany, no dictator seized power [and the emperor himself was a traditional component of Japanese government], and no ideology became dominant.” (Ibid.) Likewise, historian Ito Takashi stated that “the concept of fascism simply has no relevance for explaining developments in pre-war Japan.” (Ibid., 41) If one accepts these assessments at face value, then General Tojo was simply an authoritarian figure within the military institution and cannot honestly be described as a dictator. His political involvement during the war — he was Prime Minister — traces back to the legacy of Japanese samurai, who were politically active in order to get what they needed militarily from the government. So this was nothing new to Japanese politics and it cannot really be classified as fascist.

Now, if one was to use the Ernst Nolte definition of fascism, then there were indeed aspects of fascism to be found in Japan. Nolte’s definition is essentially one that characterizes fascism as a reactionary political movement that seeks to recreate the “social relations typical of a preindustrial peasant community.” According to this definition, fascism might best be described as ‘traditionalist’ at its core — defined by Merriam-Webster’s as “adherence to the doctrines or practices of a tradition; the beliefs of those opposed to modernism, liberalism, or radicalism” — since it rejected the liberal and progressive aspects of “post-1789 liberalism and Marxism.” (Ibid.)

Upon considering all of the problems associated with defining fascism and then honestly applying it to the case of Japan, Fletcher arrived at the conclusion that Japan’s New Order Movement, planned from 1938 to 1940, was fascist. How so? He summed it up as follows:

“Not only were the reforms which this movement advocated modeled on the institutions of fascist Italy and Nazi Germany; the movement also explicitly rejected the competition and tensions apparent in modern society. Moreover, the goals of the New Order Movement — to build an economically strong Japan while eliminating the tensions of industrialization — embodied a contradiction which appears to be a salient feature of all fascist movements.” (Ibid.)

Fascism or an attempt to amalgamate industrialization and cultural and political tradition?

Again, this definition assumes that the governments of both Italy and Germany were indeed fascist, and then uses that assumption as the basis for arguing that the New Order Movement in Japan was fascist. However, I think it is clear that one cannot describe Japan as fascist when only a few parts of its system — such as this New Order Movement — exhibited fascist traits. For one to do this one would likewise have to describe America under Roosevelt and Great Britain under Churchill as also having been fascist, since personal freedoms were inhibited and information controlled, lightly to severely, during the same time period — e.g., anti-German and anti-Japanese propaganda via Walt Disney corporation and Hollywood, media control of information in Britain and America, actual media lies and omissions, banned Hitler speeches, the involuntary military draft in both America and Britain, imprisoning of “draft dodgers,” execution of “traitors,” and the internment of German and Japanese citizens in both countries, as well as property confiscation.

Now, if one is going to argue that increased militarism (see definition here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Militarism), or militarism itself, is a trait of fascist governments, then the definition of fascism becomes more problematic. China, Japan, America, Germany, Britain, Croatia, Yugoslavia, the Czech Republic, Poland, and Italy all became more militaristic during these years, and the US long after. After the war the United States was not only imperialist in every sense of the term, — it annexed Hawaii in 1898, committed a Holocaust in the Philippines, and after WWII occupied both Germany and Japan — but had worked diligently to establish military bases worldwide, and had built itself one of the largest military forces in the world post-WWII. The US has the highest military expenditure in the world today, in fact. Besides, increased militarism has been rather commonplace throughout Chinese, British, European, and Japanese history.

An article on Global Issues’ website stated the following:

“Summarizing some key details from chapter 8 of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SPIRI)’s 2007 Year Book on Armaments, Disarmament and International Security for 2005:

  • The USA, responsible for about 80 per cent of the [military expenditure] increase in 2005, is the principal determinant of the current world trend, and its military expenditure now accounts for almost half of the world total;

SIPRI also commented on the increasing concentration of military expenditure, i.e., that a small number of countries spend the largest sums:

  • The USA is responsible for 46 per cent of the [military expenditure] world total, distantly followed by the UK, France, Japan and China with 4-5 per cent each.” (http://www.globalissues.org/Geopolitics/ArmsTrade/Spending.asp)

Additionally, according to Dr. Jules DuFour, Professor of Geography at the University of Quebec, Chicoutimi, and President of the United Nations Association of Canada:

“The main sources of information on these military installations (e.g., C. Johnson, the NATO Watch Committee, the International Network for the Abolition of Foreign Military Bases) reveal that the US operates and/or controls between 700 and 800 military bases Worldwide.” As of 1 July 2007, “[i]n total, there are 255,065 US military personnel deployed [w]orldwide.” (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=5564)

Is this not increased militarism or even simply militarism? The point of militarism appears moot upon consideration of these facts and trends: Who actually considers the US fascist? Increased militarism has nothing to do with fascism, unless of course one is going to argue that the US is currently a fascist state; yet, this militarism aspect seems to be what most scholars emphasize in their descriptions of the Italian, German and Japanese governments in the 1930s; that their increased militarism was a either a precursor or symptom of fascism. (For instance, see http://www.jstor.org/pss/1947335, “Militarism and Fascism in Japan”)

Hitler with Japanese officials.

Taking this further, with regard to economic planning, couldn’t one argue that Roosevelt’s New Deal, as well as his bid to try for a third term, might also be seen as traits of a fascist government? Our previous definition indicates that one sign of fascism is “stringent social and economic control.” Isn’t this what happened in America under the New Deal? Aren’t the current stringent social doctrines of ”political correctness,” anti-fascism, or even anti-Nazism fascist? Indeed, anti-fascism itself is facist. Anyone who exhibited any sort of political sympathy for either Germany or Japan was labeled a Fifth Columnist and harassed or arrested in the US and Britain during WWII. This is but one example of social and political oppression and stringency in America at the time.

As far as economic control, Jewish Americans advocated a boycott against German goods (to bring the Nazi government down economically), the US blockaded Japan and tried to starve it to death (which resulted in the attack on Pearl Harbor), and the US and British governments both imposed sanctions against countries who dealt with Italy, Germany, and Japan (further examples of democratic efforts at economic control included asset seizures, frozen accounts, boycotts, blockades, and 24-7 air raids designed to cause economic breakdown).

Britain exhibited plenty of fascist tendencies. Lest one overlook the fact that Oswald Mosley was arrested and imprisoned at Brixton, without charge, on 23 May 1940; simply because he chose to affiliate himself with the British Union of Fascists (he was also starved for some time and kept in solitary confinement). There is no getting around the fact that he was a victim of torture and a political prisoner of Winston Churchill. He never committed any crimes.

Back to America: the American economy at the time was planned since it had entirely collapsed due to the Great Depression. Private capital and the working class came under a centralized economic plan known as the New Deal (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Deal). This centralized plan included social and economic control. According to our previous definition, fascist governments are “usually headed by a dictator.” In this case one can certainly argue that Roosevelt aspired to become a dictator by violating the Constitution and pursuing a third term. (see http://www.jstor.org/pss/1952282, “Roosevelt’s Third Term Decision”) However, describing America in the 1930s as fascist just because of these developments makes little sense to most scholars. One can see how the same rule applies to Japan — and, in my view, to Germany.

Defining and applying the term fascism is a historiographical dilemma: it should not be used to describe Japan from 1931-1945 or for any time in its history, as a matter of fact. The term does not portray an accurate picture of Japan at the time. As our assessment has clearly demonstrated, it is difficult enough to apply this term to both Italy and Germany. We have seen that Japan was characteristically oligarchic in the political sense. We have also seen that certain aspects of the fascist ‘definition menu’ can be applied to America and Great Britain, both before and after the time period in question. Why then aren’t either of these states characterized as fascist by historians? Furthermore, we have seen that many reputable historians, like Fletcher and Kentaro, feel that characterizing Japan as fascist is simply impossible given the facts. Lastly, the term fascism itself is often vaguely or incompletely defined, and definitions vary depending on the historian. I hope that one will agree that Japan was not a fascist country at any point in its history, including the period from 1931-1945, since it exhibited only some of the traits that are considered fascist and because its oligarchic political tradition was remnant during the time period in question.

This essay brought to you by VSS.

No Gravatar

by Patrick Roberts | January 28, 2010

Source: http://www.irishcentral.com/news/Adolf-Hitler-the-Irish-folk-music-fan.html

Hitler & Goebbels signing autographs. (Bundesarchiv)

Newly released historical photographs reveal that famous Irish musician Sean Dempsey played for Adolf Hitler in 1936, and the Nazi dictator loved his music.

Dempsey, an uileann piper, was invited to play for Hitler and propaganda chief Joseph Goebbels during a visit to Berlin in 1936 after being told that Hitler was an Irish folk music fan.

When he arrived to play however, there was no room for him to sit, which he needed to do to play, and it looked like it would be canceled.

However, Hitler jumped up and demanded that an S.S. member get down on his hands and knees and that Dempsey sit astride him while he played.

SS: I can so picture this scene.

Dempsey played what was described as a ‘haunting air’ as Hitler listened with rapt attention. After he performed, Hitler presented him with a gold fountain pen while Goebbels clapped wildly.

The bizarre scene was revealed for the first time in a new exhibition of Irish photographs from that era called ‘Ceol na Cathra.’ The exhibition opened in Dublin and was collected by legendary fiddle player Mick O’Connor.

Also in the exhibit are rare photographs from the early days of The Chieftains and Sean O’Riada, the father of modern Irish folk music.

This news article brought to you by VSS.

with a focus on Adolf Hitler.